Robinson, T., Gammon, S. (2011). A Question of Primary and Secondary Motives: Revisiting and Applying the Sport Tourism Framework. Journal of Applied Sports Science, 1(1), 58-71. doi: 10.21608/jass.2011.84888
Tom Robinson; Sean Gammon. "A Question of Primary and Secondary Motives: Revisiting and Applying the Sport Tourism Framework". Journal of Applied Sports Science, 1, 1, 2011, 58-71. doi: 10.21608/jass.2011.84888
Robinson, T., Gammon, S. (2011). 'A Question of Primary and Secondary Motives: Revisiting and Applying the Sport Tourism Framework', Journal of Applied Sports Science, 1(1), pp. 58-71. doi: 10.21608/jass.2011.84888
Robinson, T., Gammon, S. A Question of Primary and Secondary Motives: Revisiting and Applying the Sport Tourism Framework. Journal of Applied Sports Science, 2011; 1(1): 58-71. doi: 10.21608/jass.2011.84888
A Question of Primary and Secondary Motives: Revisiting and Applying the Sport Tourism Framework
1Hanze Institute for Sport Studies, Hanzehogeschool, Groningen, The Netherlands
2Department of Tourism and Leisure, University of Luton, United Kingdom
Abstract
The motivation(s) of the sport tourist has been a regular source of discussion within much of the sport tourism literature (Gammon and Robinson, 1997; Gibson, 1998a; Hinch and Higham, 2004; Kurtzman and Zauhar, 1995a; Standeven and De Knop, 1999). Much consideration has been paid to the interaction and influence each sport or tourism motive has upon the other. This paper discusses the complexity of combining these motives; concluding that it is unrealistic to list all the possible motivational variations, but more enlightening to suggest that a relationship exits based upon primary and secondary considerations. Using this premise, a sport tourism framework is detailed (originally outlined in 1997) which not only illustrates a tentative sport tourist typology (based upon competitiveness, recreation, activity and passivity) but also a method by which organisations can utilise, in order to identify current and future sport tourism developments. Four applications of the framework are included which demonstrate its utility with regards to general, domestic, local and sport specific profiling. Lastly it is suggested that a sport tourism index be created where countries, regions and cities can compare their current sport tourism offerings with either competitors or national/international averages.